Welcome to NZ Architecture Forums, Guest! Log In or Sign Up or
Post a New Reply
Reply to thread: Good to see some evidence of architectural thought for Mars habitats
Post Subject:
Post Icon:
Your Message:
Angel Angry Blush Confused
Dodgy Exclamation Heart Huh
Idea Sleepy Undecided Smile
Wink Cool Big Grin Tongue
Rolleyes Shy Sad  
Post Options:
Thread Subscription:
Specify the type of notification and thread subscription you'd like to have to this thread. (Registered users only)

Human Verification
Please tick the checkbox that you see below. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.

Your allocated attachment usage quota is Unlimited. [View My Attachments]
New Attachment:

Terms of Use

Thread Review (Newest First)
Posted by admin - 09-Sep-2019, 02:15 PM
.. and here are a few architectural responses to lunar context (including one by Fosters),674,328
Posted by admin - 31-Aug-2019, 01:09 PM
Some more architects looking at Mars construction issues:
Posted by admin - 06-Aug-2019, 12:07 PM
Another video, from an entry that did not make it to the final cut, but looks to be based on a fair extrapolation of current technological advances

Not clear to me what purpose is served with the very large gap implied between the 3D printed radiation shell and inflatable interior.  Maybe shielded maintenance/construction access?
Posted by admin - 19-Jul-2019, 03:49 PM
I see there is a video intended to justify the winning entry cylindrical form on at least technical grounds, even if arguably not fully engaging in an architectonic sense with the low martian gravity environment
Posted by Bruce Mitchinson - 30-Oct-2018, 09:10 AM
Interesting to see some modular design features appearing in some of the designs.
Given that the construction method is printing, I would question why this is the case, perhaps it might be to create some cognitive connection to how its done back home, so as not to alienate the inhabitants [?]
Outside images dominate too, although, given the outdoor conditions, it is more likely that the interior will become the facade.
What we also know is that acceleration due to gravity is significantly less than on earth, and yet we see no discernible difference to the familiar dome [arch] structures designed for 9.8m/s2, down here, and no lofty expression of floating, in the way the proposed structures contact with the ground.
Makes me think are we really ready to let go of home.
Posted by admin - 30-Oct-2018, 08:30 AM
(27-Jul-2018, 12:08 AM)admin Wrote: Archdaily article. Worth a look.

And here is a link to all 5 stage 1 winners.
Posted by admin - 27-Jul-2018, 12:08 AM
Archdaily article. Worth a look.